It is Euthanasia and it echoes the Schindler-Schiavo case


Eluana Englao, a vivacious young woman has allegedly been in a PVS since a care crash in 1992. She receives nourishment through a feeding tube (in other words she is breathing on her own). Her father claims that Eluano was opposed to being kept alive artificially, but in reality what does that mean? The provision of food and water through a feeding tube can hardly be called keeping a person artificially alive. On the other hand, I would argue that being hooked to a machine to help the person breathe, or keep the heart pumping is a different matter and would fall under the “keeping someone artificially alive” rule.

I have not seen a lot about this case. I do not know if this woman had the same level or ability as Teri (even though the MCS of Teri was denied). Therefore, I cannot comment upon certain aspects of this case.

What the court did in this case is also wrong because unless this is a written request no one can say for certain that she would not want to be fed. Regardless, where I object to the proposals is the claim that once the tubes are withdrawn Miss Englaro would not feel a thing. That is an outright lie and it is one that needs to be consistently challenged until people understand the precise pain of someone who is healthy being forced to die in such a fashion. Forcing someone to become dehydrated is totally inhuman and expecting the person to last up to two weeks in that conditions is extremely cruel.

Well, the Italian government has stepped in again in an effort to stop the murder by cruelty of this young woman. This action will cause problems in Italy because the President is opposed to the action but the Parliament will continue to move to prevent the murder taking place.

If we have learned anything from the shabby way that Teri Schindler was treated by her adulderous, murderous husband it is the fact that death by dehydration and starvation is anything but pretty. It is a disgusting way to die and it should be opposed.

If this woman had been hooked to breathing apparatus and the removal meant a quick death because she could not breathe on her own then that would be a very different story.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “It is Euthanasia and it echoes the Schindler-Schiavo case

  1. ajlouny

    It would be a horrible crime to starve this woman to death. A baby is incapable of feeding itself, does that mean they are not worthy of living. She is breathing on her own, her heart is pumping on its own. There is no force to stay alive. Who’s right is it to decide her fate on living or dying?

  2. charlesrowley

    Maggie:
    I agree with you that life is very precious and should always be protected to the extent possible. John Locke suggested that life and liberty are inalienable rights. That means that one cannot give them up, even should one wish to do so. Certainly, it means that others do not have the right to take them away, except when the individual places himself in a state of war with others.
    Charles

Comments are closed.